To say that is general consensus amongst the internet wrestling community is against the current PG friendly product that WWE is producing is an understatement. Whether it be the physiotherapist cleaning up the slightest bit of blood or the Hanna Montana style “comedy”, internet fans will take to Twitter, Facebook or their blog (ahem) in droves to express their displeasure at the current product. Regardless of this fact, they will keep watching WWE, because they love it and can find enjoyment even through times were they feel frustrated as fans. The same, however, cannot be said for the casual fan – the fans that will watch while channel hopping. How often have we read reports of a certain segment of WWE Raw resulting in sever hundred thousand views tuning out? Several, hundred, thousand. That is a lot of viewership to throw away. And the numbers do not lie – In September 1999 the (then) WWF had its most watched Raw of all time with a Nielsen rating of 8.4 compared to its lowest rating of 2.39 this January. What this means is that during the much fabled ‘attitude era’, WWE at one point had 8.4% of American households watching compared to 2.39% of them in the very recent ‘PG era’ months. So, with all this in mind I want to stress that I too feel that WWE has got it wrong with their PG product, but not because of any of the above. My reason is that I am worried about the future of the business.
There are 2 common explanations to why the WWE has switched to a PG-friendly product.
- The Chris Benoit incident and the fallout of this.
- Aiming the product at children will bring in more money as they are more likely to buy merchandise, toys and games.
Now the first point is self explanatory, but did the second point begs the question – What happens when the kids grow up? If the product is solely aimed at children then what happens when they grow up? With so much television and entertainment mediums available to teenagers, will they really find 5+ hours per week to watch something they no longer see as “cool”? How many programmes, musicians or films were aimed at you when you were a kid do you still follow? To draw comparisons to my own childhood, I used to love both Power Rangers and Football. Power Rangers was aimed at me when I was young and I couldn’t get enough of it. I bought the costume, toys, videos (VHS. Remember those?) etc because I loved it. However after a while this wore off and I grew out of power rangers. I am aware that they kept reinventing the power rangers, for example dino thunder/ jungle fury/ on holiday/ going for a swim (I may have made some of them up) to attract new fans but even amongst kids, they got less and less viewers. Now on the other hand with football, I am very much still a fan and was one of the 715 million people to watch the 2010 world cup final. I will buy the sports TV package to watch football, go to Newcastle United games and even buy the replica shirt. Football differed from Power Rangers in its appeal to me when I was young. Where Power Rangers was aimed at a pre-teen me, football wasn’t. Football was presented as what it was, and put together as a package that appealed to a very important person in this blog – my dad. I used to watch the football with my dad, the same way my friends would watch the football with their dads. My dad supported Newcastle, so I supported Newcastle. So, to bring this back to wrestling I can completely understand the WWE wanting to ensure that children watch their product. After all, they are the future. However, much like power rangers, I feel WWE will have to constantly make new fans if they continue to make their product solely for children.
What makes the current direction of the WWE product even more baffling is a fact I have taken from market research conducted by WWE themselves in 2009 and 2011, to find out who watches their product (information that is made available to companies who potentially want to sponsor WWE). In 2011 WWE found that 48% of fans are aged 18-49, 30% are aged 50+ and 22% are aged under 18 (with 15% aged 12-17). A quick bit of maths will tell us that only 7% of fans are under 12 years old, so you have a very small % of the WWE fan base that falls into the PG bracket of TV classification. WWE already has a large volume (78%) of adult fans watching their show, but this will not last forever. Once the adult fans start to diminish, unless the young fans turn into adult fans, the numbers will continue their downwards trend. This is backed up by the fact that in 2009 WWE had 67% of fans aged 18-49, compared to just 48% now.
So, how do the WWE reverse this downwards trend? In a nutshell I feel that WWE have to put their focus on transitioning their young fans into adult fans, and can only do this by aiming their product at the older members of the young fan’s family, whether that be the dad or older brother. Kids love to feel more grown up than they are, so by presenting a more mature product you are providing this opportunity, a bit like watching a 15-rated movie when you weren’t old enough. WWE needs to aim its products at kids, by not presenting a kids product. They need to take a more subtle tact.
This isn’t another cry to bring back the attitude era – the attitude era has been and gone, but that doesn’t mean they have to stick with the PG era. Keep the in ring style as it is, with all the current restrictions (on some high risk moves, unprotected chair shots, etc) and avoid any distasteful storylines. But just because we can agree that wrapping a chair around Mick Foleys head while he is handcuffed and Triple H wearing Kane’s mask pretending to have sexual intercourse with a dead body is not what fans want to see, doesn’t mean that WWE must go in the complete opposite direction. Supple changes will do the job. An injection if adult humour, the odd swear word and some mature, complex characters. Maybe it could be suggested (again) that WWE take a look at what companies like the UFC are doing to attract a more mature fan base. There is no ‘quick win’ for this, but something needs to change.
There are counter arguments that in today’s world of political correctness, WWE could risk losing big sponsorship, or at worst TV deals, if they reverted to a more risqué product but let’s be honest – if their viewership increases, they will be able to command big advertising/licensing fees regardless. Another factor is the stigma that “wrestling is fake therefore not cool”. WWE created this stigma and, with enough hard work, could easily get rid of it much like the NWO did for a spell in 1997 and 1998. Yes there would be some drawbacks from changing the PG ethos but the positives far outweigh the negatives. Instead of dumping “Lil Jimmy” when he ‘grows out of’ the product, why not offer him a reason to stick around? Maybe Lil Jimmy will influence his younger siblings, Lil Jenny and Lil Jonny, to start watching and who knows, perhaps one day Lil Jimmy, Jenny and Jonny will have their own kids who will sit down and watch wrestling as 3 different families.
The company needs to evolve. Without evolution, everything dies. Aim for the kids, via somebody they look up to.
Thanks for reading – I would love to hear your views. Maybe you absolutely LOVE the PG era and disagree completely. Drop me a line @CallingSpots
Until then – Peace out.
Rich x
Finally! It’s great to see one else using the market research data.
I would like to think that WWE is trying to create their own “wrestling cycle” by aiming towards kids, then progressing more towards an AE style product as they age. However, I don’t have confidence in company officials to have thought that far through.
I don’t have an issue with the “PG” label (though I feel we should all refer to this era as something else, since the product has almost always been PG rated). My issue, is the lack of creativity and sense.
LikeLike
Its more the dumbed/watered down comedy, lack of mature storylines and writing scripts for people who don’t need scripts that grinds my gears.
LikeLike
I can’t really blame creative when Vince is always changing his mind.
LikeLike
J, I couldn’t agree more.
I’ve said it once, I’ll say it a million times, It’s not the PG product that hurts the WWE, It’s the terrible writing, you can’t have people that don’t know wrestling write the shows, you can’t have your writers write out a promo for someone, because they don’t know what they would say, I wish they would let them all go out there and say what they want, as long as they hit on a few bullet points, give them an idea of where to go with a promo, but let them get there on there own.
The WWF was pretty much PG from the 1980’s-1997 and that time frame had some of the best stuff ever. It’s not the rating, It’s the writing.
LikeLike
So true, TNA is Evolving and WWE isn’t
LikeLike
Just because TNA does stuff WWE doesn’t, doesn’t mean they’re evolving, TNA is going backwards, and they’re definitely not winning any ratings wars.
LikeLike
TNA is going backwards…to move forward. Hard to explain what that means but it’s what they’re doing. I’m not an expert or anything but it’s the way the business works apparently, all to do with demand and stuff.
LikeLike
yeah they aren’t winning the ratings war, but they are growing progressively and while doing some old stuff it is stuff we like, only thing missing from TNA is a guy like CM Punk
LikeLike
TNA have guys like Punk…they have Aires, Styles, Joe….they have tons of talent, it’s just booking them. Lagana is the new head writer now so I can expect change. TNA has been better lately, their two episodes in the UK were amazing!
LikeLike
yeah they episodes were great and the whole wembley arena was full
LikeLike
Agreed. TNA has a far superior roster in terms of in ring tallent alone. They have so many guys that could be groomed into very very good wrestlers if they just realised what potential they have.
LikeLike
The only thing that I watched when I was a kid and still follow to this day is Wrestling. That should tell you something 🙂
LikeLike
It’s your drug! 😀
BTW guys…how does the text on the left and right side of page look like? Is it accurate on your PC screens?
LikeLike
Very creative 🙂
LikeLike
Thank You my friend! 😀
LikeLike
I read this column a couple days ago and I still think it’s us who have changed more than the product.
http://www.lopforums.com/showthread.php/7064-Through-the-eyes-of-a-three-year-old
LikeLike
I read this from my phone last night, it was a good read.
I completely agree what they guy is saying, but it isn’t ”us” who have changed the product. I still think it has a lot to do with MMA getting bigger last few years so the WWE had to tone their product down and appeal to a younger audience to make more profit,
LikeLike
I should’ve said that better. Sorry. I’m not saying that “we changed the product”. I’m saying that we have changed more than the booking has changed. We think about, talk, and observe wrestling differently than we used to.
LikeLike
@Ray “moving backwards to move forward” is what WWE is doing, not TNA.
TNA doesn’t know what they’re doing, If they did, certain people wouldn’t still be with te company, and they wouldn’t continue to make the same mistakes. And Lagana isn’t the head writer…yet.
LikeLike
I know the WWE are doing that but I do see indications on TNA doing that too. Well, maybe not but they are doing something different that this time last year anyway, I couldn’t watch it this time last year, it was so dire.
LikeLike
Great write up man! I love it when there’s cold hard facts and it’s not a boring history lesson. This is pure meat! (not the great wrestler, either)
I can see how aiming the show at younger kids would be a good way to keep them hooked. If you look at it in a cycle, growing up when I was a kid it was PG. Then I was a teenager and it went to the Attitude Era, and now back to PG. I could see in another 5-8 years the product start to get a little more edgy and such. I think Vince has it in his mind this is how he gets new fans.
LikeLike
@ Capt. That’s what I thought you meant to say.
LikeLike
Yeah, I’m losing it. lol
LikeLike
Great article, really enjoyed the read but you have to look at the whole picture to firstly understand the rating drop off. 12 years ago, other sports were not plastered over TV like they are now, even if you look at the UK. We have 10+ sports channels showing a huge array of sports. And the US, potentially even more. Plus with the introduction of so many Wrestling News Sites, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and “illegal downloads” people can hear about the product and watch it over so many more avenues.
Furthermore, as mentioned UFC has cut into that audience but I am a big MMA and Wrestling fan, and I dont think UFC has taken the fans away because of the MMA product. What the WWE have lost, is fans who dont like watching the same stuff, I stopped watching for two years because I was sick of seeing Cena and Orton dominate the product, and now 4 years on, they are still dominating the product, even when they lose, they still look strong and they help keep certain stars down.
People talk about the writing now. Some of the mid to lower card writing in the attitude era was abysmal. Its just now, the abysmal writing from the mid card back then is seemingly involved with more of the higher card storylines. Furthermore, some of the acting is truly atrocious.
And targeting the families, its earning more money for the company and the WWE will be hoping when the young adults grow up, they will return to WWE once they have kids, thats the idea.
LikeLike